Diff

Ford vs Wispr Flow

63 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#ffffff #ffffeb
Text
#333333 #1a1a1a
Brand
#003478 #f0d7ff
Border
#dde2e8 #1a1a1a4d
Display font
FordF1 EB Garamond
Body size
16px 16px
colors 53 changed
~ bg #ffffff #ffffeb
~ bg-dark #102b4e #e4e4d0
~ surface #ffffff #034f46
~ surface-soft #f5f7fa #e4e4d0
~ text #333333 #1a1a1a
~ brand #003478 #f0d7ff
~ on-brand #ffffff #1a1a1a
~ border #dde2e8 #1a1a1a4d
~ border-strong #b6bdc7 #1a1a1a80
~ border-soft #eceff3 #1a1a1a1a
~ shadow-elev rgba(16,43,78,0.12) rgba(26,26,15,0.10)
~ success #258636 #114e0b
~ warning #f26822 #5e5515
~ danger #bf152c #7f1c34
+ text-darkest #111111
+ text-soft #888888
+ on-surface #ffffeb
+ brand-ink #1a1a1a
+ accent-glow #ffa946
+ accent-fathom #034f46
+ accent-pulse #7f1c34
+ white #ffffff
+ shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05)
+ scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50)
+ success-soft #cef5ca
+ warning-soft #fcf8d8
+ danger-soft #f8e4e4
+ focus-state #2d62ff
bg-soft #f5f7fa
bg-card #ffffff
bg-strong #e6ebf2
bg-dark-elev #1a3a64
bg-deep #00142e
surface-card #ffffff
surface-table #fafbfc
text-strong #1a1a1a
text-ink #102b4e
text-faint #9aa3ad
brand-hover #002757
brand-deep #00142e
brand-light #0860a8
brand-disabled #cdd5df
on-dark #ffffff
on-dark-soft #bcc6d2
accent-red #bf152c
accent-orange #f26822
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.18)
link #0860a8
link-hover #003478
ring #003478
shadow-soft rgba(16,43,78,0.06)
shadow-deep rgba(0,20,46,0.28)
info #0860a8
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"FordF1","size":72} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120}
~ h1 {"family":"FordF1","size":40} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48}
~ h2 {"family":"FordF1","size":32} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36}
~ body {"family":"FordF1","size":16} {"family":"Figtree","size":16}
~ label {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":11} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13}
radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~ xs 4px 0px
~ sm 8px 4px
~ md 16px 12px
~ lg 48px 32px
~ xl 96px 64px
↻ Swap direction · Wispr Flow → Ford