fal vs Affirm
53 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #13131f Text
#000000 → #101820 Brand
#252527 → #4a4af4 Border
#e5e7eb → rgba(255,255,255,0.12) Display font
focal → Axiforma for Affirm Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #13131f ~
surface #ffffff → #1c1c2b ~
text #000000 → #101820 ~
text-on-dark #fafafa → #ffffff ~
brand #252527 → #4a4af4 ~
brand-hover #0a0a0a → #3a3ad6 ~
on-brand #fafafa → #ffffff ~
border #e5e7eb → rgba(255,255,255,0.12) ~
border-strong #d1d5db → rgba(255,255,255,0.24) ~
success #16a34a → #1f9d55 ~
warning #d97706 → #b06a00 ~
danger #dc2626 → #d92d2d +
bg-deep #0c0c14 +
surface-elev #23233a +
surface-light #ffffff +
surface-light-quiet #f6f6fb +
text-on-dark-muted rgba(255,255,255,0.72) +
text-on-dark-subtle rgba(255,255,255,0.55) +
text-soft #4a4a57 +
text-subdued #6b6b78 +
brand-deep #2e2eb0 +
brand-light #7a7af7 +
brand-tint #e6e6fe +
brand-bg-hover rgba(74,74,244,0.08) +
brand-on-dark-tint rgba(74,74,244,0.18) +
accent-mint #7affc1 +
accent-sky #9fd8ff +
border-light #e2e2ec +
border-brand #4a4af4 +
link #9fa0ff +
link-on-light #4a4af4 +
success-text #0f7a3e +
success-bg rgba(31,157,85,0.16) +
warning-bg rgba(176,106,0,0.14) +
danger-bg rgba(217,45,45,0.14) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.45) +
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.28) +
shadow-light rgba(16,24,32,0.10) −
bg-soft #fafafa −
surface-elevated #ffffff −
surface-dark #0a0a0a −
surface-soft #f5f5f5 −
text-body #1b1b1d −
text-muted #6b7280 −
text-faint #9ca3af −
border-soft #f0f0f0 −
info #2563eb typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"focal","size":120} → {"family":"Axiforma for Affirm","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"focal","size":40} → {"family":"Axiforma for Affirm","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"focal","size":32} → {"family":"Axiforma for Affirm","size":32} ~
body {"family":"publicSansRounded","size":16} → {"family":"Calibre","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
card 12px → 24px ~
pill 9999px → 96px spacing identical
No differences.