Affirm vs fal
53 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#13131f → #ffffff Text
#101820 → #000000 Brand
#4a4af4 → #252527 Border
rgba(255,255,255,0.12) → #e5e7eb Display font
Axiforma for Affirm → focal Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #13131f → #ffffff ~
surface #1c1c2b → #ffffff ~
text #101820 → #000000 ~
text-on-dark #ffffff → #fafafa ~
brand #4a4af4 → #252527 ~
brand-hover #3a3ad6 → #0a0a0a ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fafafa ~
border rgba(255,255,255,0.12) → #e5e7eb ~
border-strong rgba(255,255,255,0.24) → #d1d5db ~
success #1f9d55 → #16a34a ~
warning #b06a00 → #d97706 ~
danger #d92d2d → #dc2626 +
bg-soft #fafafa +
surface-elevated #ffffff +
surface-dark #0a0a0a +
surface-soft #f5f5f5 +
text-body #1b1b1d +
text-muted #6b7280 +
text-faint #9ca3af +
border-soft #f0f0f0 +
info #2563eb −
bg-deep #0c0c14 −
surface-elev #23233a −
surface-light #ffffff −
surface-light-quiet #f6f6fb −
text-on-dark-muted rgba(255,255,255,0.72) −
text-on-dark-subtle rgba(255,255,255,0.55) −
text-soft #4a4a57 −
text-subdued #6b6b78 −
brand-deep #2e2eb0 −
brand-light #7a7af7 −
brand-tint #e6e6fe −
brand-bg-hover rgba(74,74,244,0.08) −
brand-on-dark-tint rgba(74,74,244,0.18) −
accent-mint #7affc1 −
accent-sky #9fd8ff −
border-light #e2e2ec −
border-brand #4a4af4 −
link #9fa0ff −
link-on-light #4a4af4 −
success-text #0f7a3e −
success-bg rgba(31,157,85,0.16) −
warning-bg rgba(176,106,0,0.14) −
danger-bg rgba(217,45,45,0.14) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.45) −
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.28) −
shadow-light rgba(16,24,32,0.10) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Axiforma for Affirm","size":80} → {"family":"focal","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Axiforma for Affirm","size":40} → {"family":"focal","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Axiforma for Affirm","size":32} → {"family":"focal","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Calibre","size":16} → {"family":"publicSansRounded","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
card 24px → 12px ~
pill 96px → 9999px spacing identical
No differences.