Diff

CodeSandbox vs Wispr Flow

55 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#0e0e0e #ffffeb
Text
#f0f0f0 #1a1a1a
Brand
#eaff96 #f0d7ff
Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) #1a1a1a4d
Display font
TWK Everett EB Garamond
Body size
16px 16px
colors 51 changed
~ bg #0e0e0e #ffffeb
~ surface #1d1d1d #034f46
~ text #f0f0f0 #1a1a1a
~ text-muted #a0a0a0 #666666
~ text-soft #8a8a8a #888888
~ brand #eaff96 #f0d7ff
~ on-brand #343434 #1a1a1a
~ border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) #1a1a1a4d
~ border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) #1a1a1a80
~ border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) #1a1a1a1a
~ success #7ee787 #114e0b
~ warning #f0b429 #5e5515
~ danger #ff6b6b #7f1c34
+ bg-dark #e4e4d0
+ surface-soft #e4e4d0
+ text-darkest #111111
+ on-surface #ffffeb
+ brand-ink #1a1a1a
+ accent-glow #ffa946
+ accent-fathom #034f46
+ accent-pulse #7f1c34
+ white #ffffff
+ shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05)
+ shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10)
+ scrim rgba(17,17,10,0.50)
+ success-soft #cef5ca
+ warning-soft #fcf8d8
+ danger-soft #f8e4e4
+ focus-state #2d62ff
bg-deep #080808
bg-elevated #1d1d1d
surface-high #262626
surface-low #141414
text-strong #ffffff
text-faint #5c5c5c
brand-hover #f1ffb0
brand-deep #d6f06a
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14)
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07)
lime-text #e3ff73
lime-text-hover #edff9a
link #e3ff73
link-hover #edff9a
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45)
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14)
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14)
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14)
info #e3ff73
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6)
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4)
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22)
typography 4 changed
~ display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120}
~ h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48}
~ h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36}
~ body {"family":"Inter","size":16} {"family":"Figtree","size":16}
radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Wispr Flow → CodeSandbox