CodeSandbox vs Penpot
53 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0e0e0e → #ffffff Text
#f0f0f0 → #000000 Brand
#eaff96 → #31efb8 Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #d9d9d9 Display font
TWK Everett → Work Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #0e0e0e → #ffffff ~
surface #1d1d1d → #ffffff ~
text #f0f0f0 → #000000 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #888888 ~
brand #eaff96 → #31efb8 ~
brand-hover #f1ffb0 → #2bd9a6 ~
on-brand #343434 → #151035 ~
link #e3ff73 → #151035 ~
link-hover #edff9a → #14ceca ~
border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #d9d9d9 ~
border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) → #dddddd ~
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) → #f0f0f0 +
bg-soft #f5f8fb +
surface-soft #f8f8f8 +
surface-dark #151035 +
text-indigo #151035 +
text-on-dark #fafafa +
text-on-dark-pure #ffffff +
accent-cyan #14ceca +
on-accent #151035 +
inverse-bg #151035 +
inverse-text #fafafa +
semantic-success #52c41a +
semantic-warning #faad14 +
semantic-error #ff4d4f +
semantic-info #1677ff −
bg-deep #080808 −
bg-elevated #1d1d1d −
surface-high #262626 −
surface-low #141414 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-soft #8a8a8a −
text-faint #5c5c5c −
brand-deep #d6f06a −
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) −
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) −
lime-text #e3ff73 −
lime-text-hover #edff9a −
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) −
success #7ee787 −
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) −
warning #f0b429 −
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) −
danger #ff6b6b −
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) −
info #e3ff73 −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) −
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} → {"family":"Work Sans","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} → {"family":"Work Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} → {"family":"Work Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Work Sans","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.