CodeSandbox vs Capital One
51 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0e0e0e → #ffffff Text
#f0f0f0 → #000000 Brand
#eaff96 → #0276b1 Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #000000 Display font
TWK Everett → Optimist Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #0e0e0e → #ffffff ~
surface #1d1d1d → #ffffff ~
text #f0f0f0 → #000000 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #6b7177 ~
brand #eaff96 → #0276b1 ~
border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #000000 ~
border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) → #004977 ~
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) → #d4d8dd ~
success #7ee787 → #1a7f37 ~
warning #f0b429 → #9a6700 ~
danger #ff6b6b → #d03027 ~
info #e3ff73 → #0276b1 ~
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) → rgba(0,0,0,0.20) ~
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) → rgba(0,0,0,0.06) +
surface-alt #f6f7f9 +
surface-navy #004977 +
text-secondary #3b3f44 +
text-on-navy #ffffff +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
brand-navy #004977 +
brand-red #d03027 +
brand-blue-hover #015e8e +
accent-red #d03027 +
focus-ring #0276b1 +
scrim rgba(0,73,119,0.55) +
shadow-medium rgba(0,0,0,0.12) −
bg-deep #080808 −
bg-elevated #1d1d1d −
surface-high #262626 −
surface-low #141414 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-soft #8a8a8a −
text-faint #5c5c5c −
brand-hover #f1ffb0 −
brand-deep #d6f06a −
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) −
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) −
on-brand #343434 −
lime-text #e3ff73 −
lime-text-hover #edff9a −
link #e3ff73 −
link-hover #edff9a −
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) −
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) −
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) −
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) −
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} → {"family":"Optimist","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} → {"family":"Optimist","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} → {"family":"Optimist","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Optimist","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.