CodeSandbox vs Anytype
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0e0e0e → #000000 Text
#f0f0f0 → #ffffff Brand
#eaff96 → #3cd9b3 Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #262626 Display font
TWK Everett → Riccione Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #0e0e0e → #000000 ~
bg-deep #080808 → #000000 ~
surface #1d1d1d → #0d0d0d ~
text #f0f0f0 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #8a8a8a ~
brand #eaff96 → #3cd9b3 ~
brand-hover #f1ffb0 → #2fc4a0 ~
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) → #0e2b25 ~
on-brand #343434 → #000000 ~
border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → #262626 ~
border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) → #3a3a3a ~
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) → #1a1a1a ~
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) → #3cd9b3 ~
success #7ee787 → #4cad00 ~
warning #f0b429 → #ffb522 ~
danger #ff6b6b → #ff6a7b ~
info #e3ff73 → #18a3f1 +
surface-elev #1a1a1a +
surface-hover #242424 +
text-secondary #b8b8b8 +
brand-active #27a98a +
brand-text #3cd9b3 +
any-teal #3cd9b3 +
any-blue #18a3f1 +
any-green #4cad00 +
any-amber #ffb522 +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) +
success-soft #0f2200 +
warning-soft #2a1d00 +
danger-soft #2e1115 −
bg-elevated #1d1d1d −
surface-high #262626 −
surface-low #141414 −
text-soft #8a8a8a −
brand-deep #d6f06a −
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) −
lime-text #e3ff73 −
lime-text-hover #edff9a −
link #e3ff73 −
link-hover #edff9a −
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) −
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) −
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) −
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} → {"family":"Riccione","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} → {"family":"Riccione","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} → {"family":"Riccione","size":36} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.