Anytype vs CodeSandbox
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #0e0e0e Text
#ffffff → #f0f0f0 Brand
#3cd9b3 → #eaff96 Border
#262626 → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) Display font
Riccione → TWK Everett Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #000000 → #0e0e0e ~
bg-deep #000000 → #080808 ~
surface #0d0d0d → #1d1d1d ~
text #ffffff → #f0f0f0 ~
text-muted #8a8a8a → #a0a0a0 ~
brand #3cd9b3 → #eaff96 ~
brand-hover #2fc4a0 → #f1ffb0 ~
brand-soft #0e2b25 → rgba(234,255,150,0.14) ~
on-brand #000000 → #343434 ~
border #262626 → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) ~
border-soft #1a1a1a → rgba(240,240,240,0.06) ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → rgba(240,240,240,0.18) ~
border-brand #3cd9b3 → rgba(234,255,150,0.45) ~
success #4cad00 → #7ee787 ~
warning #ffb522 → #f0b429 ~
danger #ff6a7b → #ff6b6b ~
info #18a3f1 → #e3ff73 +
bg-elevated #1d1d1d +
surface-high #262626 +
surface-low #141414 +
text-soft #8a8a8a +
brand-deep #d6f06a +
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) +
lime-text #e3ff73 +
lime-text-hover #edff9a +
link #e3ff73 +
link-hover #edff9a +
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) +
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) +
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) +
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) −
surface-elev #1a1a1a −
surface-hover #242424 −
text-secondary #b8b8b8 −
brand-active #27a98a −
brand-text #3cd9b3 −
any-teal #3cd9b3 −
any-blue #18a3f1 −
any-green #4cad00 −
any-amber #ffb522 −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
success-soft #0f2200 −
warning-soft #2a1d00 −
danger-soft #2e1115 typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"Riccione","size":88} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Riccione","size":48} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} ~
h2 {"family":"Riccione","size":36} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.