Chase vs Wispr Flow
48 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffeb Text
#101820 → #1a1a1a Brand
#0060f0 → #f0d7ff Border
#d4d9e0 → #1a1a1a4d Display font
Open Sans → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #ffffeb ~
surface #ffffff → #034f46 ~
surface-soft #f5f7fa → #e4e4d0 ~
text #101820 → #1a1a1a ~
text-muted #5a6470 → #666666 ~
brand #0060f0 → #f0d7ff ~
border #d4d9e0 → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-strong #9aa3af → #1a1a1a80 ~
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) → rgba(17,17,10,0.50) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
success #128842 → #114e0b ~
warning #9a5b00 → #5e5515 ~
danger #c4001a → #7f1c34 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
text-soft #888888 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
border-soft #1a1a1a1a +
white #ffffff +
shadow-card rgba(26,26,15,0.05) +
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) +
success-soft #cef5ca +
warning-soft #fcf8d8 +
danger-soft #f8e4e4 +
focus-state #2d62ff −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-faint #6b7280 −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
text-on-green #ffffff −
brand-hover #0048bf −
brand-deep #003594 −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
link #0060f0 −
link-hover #0048bf −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) −
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) −
info #0060f0 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.