Anytype vs Wispr Flow
51 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#000000 → #ffffeb Text
#ffffff → #1a1a1a Brand
#3cd9b3 → #f0d7ff Border
#262626 → #1a1a1a4d Display font
Riccione → EB Garamond Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #000000 → #ffffeb ~
surface #0d0d0d → #034f46 ~
text #ffffff → #1a1a1a ~
text-muted #8a8a8a → #666666 ~
brand #3cd9b3 → #f0d7ff ~
on-brand #000000 → #1a1a1a ~
border #262626 → #1a1a1a4d ~
border-soft #1a1a1a → #1a1a1a1a ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → #1a1a1a80 ~
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) → rgba(26,26,15,0.05) ~
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) → rgba(17,17,10,0.50) ~
success #4cad00 → #114e0b ~
success-soft #0f2200 → #cef5ca ~
warning #ffb522 → #5e5515 ~
warning-soft #2a1d00 → #fcf8d8 ~
danger #ff6a7b → #7f1c34 ~
danger-soft #2e1115 → #f8e4e4 +
bg-dark #e4e4d0 +
surface-soft #e4e4d0 +
text-darkest #111111 +
text-soft #888888 +
on-surface #ffffeb +
brand-ink #1a1a1a +
accent-glow #ffa946 +
accent-fathom #034f46 +
accent-pulse #7f1c34 +
white #ffffff +
shadow-elev rgba(26,26,15,0.10) +
focus-state #2d62ff −
bg-deep #000000 −
surface-elev #1a1a1a −
surface-hover #242424 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-secondary #b8b8b8 −
text-faint #5c5c5c −
brand-hover #2fc4a0 −
brand-active #27a98a −
brand-text #3cd9b3 −
brand-soft #0e2b25 −
any-teal #3cd9b3 −
any-blue #18a3f1 −
any-green #4cad00 −
any-amber #ffb522 −
border-brand #3cd9b3 −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) −
info #18a3f1 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Riccione","size":88} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Riccione","size":48} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Riccione","size":36} → {"family":"EB Garamond","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Figtree","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.