Accenture vs Capital One
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0a0a0a → #ffffff Text
#ffffff → #000000 Brand
#a600ff → #0276b1 Border
#2e2e2e → #000000 Display font
Graphik → Optimist Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg #0a0a0a → #ffffff ~
surface #141414 → #ffffff ~
text #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #6b7177 ~
brand #a600ff → #0276b1 ~
border #2e2e2e → #000000 ~
border-strong #4d4d4d → #004977 ~
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) → rgba(0,73,119,0.55) ~
success #3ad29f → #1a7f37 ~
warning #ffb800 → #9a6700 ~
danger #ff5252 → #d03027 ~
info #a600ff → #0276b1 +
surface-alt #f6f7f9 +
surface-navy #004977 +
text-secondary #3b3f44 +
text-on-navy #ffffff +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
brand-navy #004977 +
brand-red #d03027 +
brand-blue-hover #015e8e +
accent-red #d03027 +
border-soft #d4d8dd +
focus-ring #0276b1 +
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.06) +
shadow-medium rgba(0,0,0,0.12) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) −
bg-pure #000000 −
surface-soft #1c1c1c −
surface-strong #262626 −
surface-light #ffffff −
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-body #e6e6e6 −
text-soft #6b6b6b −
text-on-light #0a0a0a −
text-on-light-mute #525252 −
brand-bright #be4bff −
brand-deep #7d00c4 −
brand-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) −
on-brand #ffffff −
border-on-light #e0e0e0 −
link #ffffff −
link-hover #a600ff −
focus #a600ff −
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) −
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) −
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) −
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Graphik","size":80} → {"family":"Optimist","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Graphik","size":40} → {"family":"Optimist","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Graphik","size":32} → {"family":"Optimist","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Graphik","size":16} → {"family":"Optimist","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.