Diff

Zed vs Obsidian

57 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#f5f5f3 #0f0f0f
Text
#393d45 #eeeeee
Brand
#004edb #7c3aed
Border
#e2e2de #2a2a2a
Display font
IBM Plex Serif Inter
Body size
16px 16px
colors 50 changed
~ bg #f5f5f3 #0f0f0f
~ text #393d45 #eeeeee
~ text-strong #16181d #ffffff
~ brand #004edb #7c3aed
~ brand-hover #003fb5 #6d28d9
~ brand-soft rgba(0,78,219,0.08) #2a1a4a
~ border #e2e2de #2a2a2a
~ border-strong #d4d4ce #3a3a3a
+ bg-deep #0a0a0a
+ surface #161616
+ surface-elev #1f1f1f
+ surface-hover #262626
+ text-secondary #b0b0b0
+ text-muted #a3a3a3
+ text-faint #737373
+ brand-active #5b21b6
+ brand-text #a78bfa
+ brand-text-hover #c4b5fd
+ border-soft #1f1f1f
+ border-brand #7c3aed
+ shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40)
+ shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50)
+ shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70)
+ scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65)
+ success #4ade80
+ success-soft #14321f
+ warning #fbbf24
+ warning-soft #33270a
+ danger #f87171
+ danger-soft #3a1717
+ info #a78bfa
bg-100 #ffffff
bg-200 #eeede9
bg-300 #e7e6e1
surface-card #ffffff
surface-code #1a1b1e
text-200 #5a5e66
text-300 #6b6f78
text-400 #86888f
cta-secondary-bg #ffffff
cta-secondary-text #16181d
link #004edb
link-hover #003fb5
border-focus #004edb
code-bg #1a1b1e
code-text #e6e6e3
semantic-success #2e7d32
semantic-warning #b54708
semantic-danger #c01919
semantic-info #004edb
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":72} {"family":"Inter","size":60}
~ h1 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":48} {"family":"Inter","size":40}
~ h2 {"family":"IBM Plex Serif","size":36} {"family":"Inter","size":32}
~ body {"family":"writer","size":16} {"family":"Inter","size":16}
~ label {"family":"writer-mono","size":13} {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13}
radius 2 changed
~ button 6px 8px
~ card 8px 12px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Obsidian → Zed