Warp vs Windsurf
61 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#121212 → #f6eede Text
#ffffff → #0b100f Brand
#c2ff00 → #34e8bb Border
#2a2a2a → #c0c1c6 Display font
Inter → tomatoGrotesk Body size
16px → 16px colors 52 changed
~
bg #121212 → #f6eede ~
text #ffffff → #0b100f ~
brand #c2ff00 → #34e8bb ~
on-brand #121212 → #003326 ~
link #7eb8ff → #0b100f ~
link-hover #a3cdff → #0fbf97 ~
border #2a2a2a → #c0c1c6 ~
border-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.06) → #e3e0d6 +
bg-soft #fbf7ee +
surface #ffffff +
surface-dark #0b100f +
surface-dark-soft #141a18 +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
text-body #3a423f +
text-muted #5a615d +
text-faint #8a8f8b +
text-on-dark-muted rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7) +
brand-deep #0fbf97 +
border-dark rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.12) +
ring rgba(67, 128, 180, 0.5) +
success #0fbf97 +
warning #c08a2e +
danger #d8413f +
info #4380b4 +
shadow-tint rgba(11, 16, 15, 0.10) −
bg-100 #1a1a1a −
bg-200 #222222 −
bg-300 #2c2c2c −
bg-400 #363636 −
surface-terminal #0e0e0e −
surface-card #1a1a1a −
surface-banner #f5f5f5 −
text-200 #cccccc −
text-300 #999999 −
text-400 #666666 −
text-500 #444444 −
text-banner #0a0a0a −
brand-soft #7a9e1f −
brand-glow rgba(194,255,0,0.20) −
cta-bg #ffffff −
cta-text #000000 −
cta-bg-hover #f5f5f5 −
border-strong rgba(255,255,255,0.12) −
terminal-cursor #c2ff00 −
terminal-prompt #a78bfa −
terminal-success #86efac −
terminal-error #fca5a5 −
terminal-warning #fde047 −
semantic-success #86efac −
semantic-warning #fde047 −
semantic-danger #fca5a5 −
semantic-info #7eb8ff typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":96} → {"family":"tomatoGrotesk","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":56} → {"family":"tomatoGrotesk","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"tomatoGrotesk","size":40} ~
label {"family":"Hack","size":12} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px ~
lg 48px → 32px ~
xl 96px → 64px