Warp vs Coda
64 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#121212 → #ffffff Text
#ffffff → #212121 Brand
#c2ff00 → #0066ff Border
#2a2a2a → #e3e3e3 Display font
Inter → Calibre-R Body size
16px → 16px colors 55 changed
~
bg #121212 → #ffffff ~
text #ffffff → #212121 ~
brand #c2ff00 → #0066ff ~
brand-soft #7a9e1f → #e6efff ~
on-brand #121212 → #ffffff ~
border #2a2a2a → #e3e3e3 ~
border-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.06) → #ededed ~
border-strong rgba(255,255,255,0.12) → #cccccc +
surface #ffffff +
surface-soft #fafafa +
surface-muted #f0f0f0 +
text-muted #444444 +
text-faint #717171 +
brand-hover #0052cc +
cta-primary #000000 +
accent #f8ad40 +
accent-cream #fff6ec +
accent-callout #ffe6c9 +
accent-warm #f0e5dc +
block-green #006838 +
success #1a7f4b +
success-bg #e7f4ec +
warning #9a6400 +
warning-bg #fff3df +
danger #c0392b +
danger-bg #fbeae8 +
info #0066ff +
info-bg #e6efff −
bg-100 #1a1a1a −
bg-200 #222222 −
bg-300 #2c2c2c −
bg-400 #363636 −
surface-terminal #0e0e0e −
surface-card #1a1a1a −
surface-banner #f5f5f5 −
text-200 #cccccc −
text-300 #999999 −
text-400 #666666 −
text-500 #444444 −
text-banner #0a0a0a −
brand-glow rgba(194,255,0,0.20) −
cta-bg #ffffff −
cta-text #000000 −
cta-bg-hover #f5f5f5 −
link #7eb8ff −
link-hover #a3cdff −
terminal-cursor #c2ff00 −
terminal-prompt #a78bfa −
terminal-success #86efac −
terminal-error #fca5a5 −
terminal-warning #fde047 −
semantic-success #86efac −
semantic-warning #fde047 −
semantic-danger #fca5a5 −
semantic-info #7eb8ff typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":96} → {"family":"Calibre-R","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":56} → {"family":"Calibre-R","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"Calibre-R","size":38} ~
label {"family":"Hack","size":12} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 5 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px ~
lg 48px → 32px ~
xl 96px → 64px