Sourcegraph vs Picoko
50 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #fbfaf8 Text
#ededed → #121110 Brand
#f34e3f → #fe1c71 Border
#34302d → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) Display font
PolySans → Outfit Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #fbfaf8 ~
surface #222222 → #ffffff ~
surface-soft #1f1d1c → #f9f8f6 ~
text #ededed → #121110 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #0a0909 ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #9c9793 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #6b6663 ~
text-faint #7a7672 → #c3bfbb ~
brand #f34e3f → #fe1c71 ~
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) → rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.10) ~
link #f34e3f → #121110 ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #fe1c71 ~
border #34302d → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) ~
border-strong #48433f → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.16) +
bg-alt #f5f3f0 +
surface-elevated #ffffff +
brand-deep #e5005c +
selected-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) +
disabled #c3bfbb +
border-subtle rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.04) +
border-brand rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.30) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.10) +
success-text #15803d +
warning-bg rgba(234, 179, 8, 0.12) +
warning-text #a16207 +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.10) +
danger-text #b91c1c +
info-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) +
info-text #c0004e −
bg-soft #211f1d −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
brand-hover #ff6354 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
border-soft #2a2724 −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"Outfit","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"Outfit","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"Outfit","size":36} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"Outfit","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
card 24px → 16px ~
pill 9999px → 32px spacing identical
No differences.