Sourcegraph vs On
63 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #ffffff Text
#ededed → #000000 Brand
#f34e3f → #000000 Border
#34302d → rgba(0,0,0,0.08) Display font
PolySans → On Body size
16px → 16px colors 58 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #ffffff ~
surface #222222 → #ffffff ~
surface-soft #1f1d1c → #f5f5f5 ~
text #ededed → #000000 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #767676 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #525252 ~
brand #f34e3f → #000000 ~
brand-hover #ff6354 → #1a1a1a ~
link #f34e3f → #000000 ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #525252 +
bg-dark #000000 +
surface-warm #fafafa +
ink #000000 +
ink-soft #0a0a0a +
charcoal #333333 +
mute #525252 +
mute-soft #767676 +
stone #9a9a9a +
hairline #d4d4d4 +
hairline-soft #e5e5e5 +
text-on-ink #ffffff +
brand-active #000000 +
pill-light #ffffff +
pill-light-text #000000 +
visited #000000 +
selected #000000 +
disabled-bg #e5e5e5 +
disabled-text #9a9a9a +
accent-coral #e63312 +
accent-coral-deep #b3260d +
sale #e63312 +
success #1f8a4c +
success-bright #34c873 +
warning #a35316 +
danger #d11507 +
info #1151ff +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.55) +
ring #000000 +
ring-on-dark #ffffff −
bg-soft #211f1d −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
text-faint #7a7672 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
border #34302d −
border-soft #2a2724 −
border-strong #48433f −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"On","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"On","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"On","size":32} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"On","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.