Sourcegraph vs Hume AI
56 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #fff9f3 Text
#ededed → #222222 Brand
#f34e3f → #222222 Border
#34302d → #e7dccd Display font
PolySans → Fellix Body size
16px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #fff9f3 ~
bg-soft #211f1d → #fdf4ec ~
surface #222222 → #f7ede1 ~
surface-strong #2c2a28 → #efe2d2 ~
text #ededed → #222222 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #000000 ~
text-soft #b8b8b8 → #7a7269 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #5c554e ~
text-faint #7a7672 → #a89e92 ~
brand #f34e3f → #222222 ~
brand-hover #ff6354 → #000000 ~
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) → #3a3633 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fff9f3 ~
link #f34e3f → #222222 ~
link-hover #ff6354 → #000000 ~
border #34302d → #e7dccd ~
border-soft #2a2724 → #f0e6d9 ~
border-strong #48433f → #d9cdbb +
surface-hover #f4e8da +
text-medium #3a3633 +
on-cta #fff9f3 +
accent #e8d5c4 +
accent-deep #d9bfa6 +
accent-faint #f3e7da +
selected-bg #f3e7da +
disabled-bg #f4e8da +
disabled-text #a89e92 +
border-focus #222222 +
success-bg #e3efe0 +
success-text #3f6b3a +
warning-bg #fbeecf +
warning-text #8a6420 +
danger-bg #f7e0db +
danger-text #a4362a +
info-bg #e8e6e3 +
info-text #3a3633 +
shadow-rgb 34, 28, 22 +
shadow-warm 160, 120, 80 −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-soft #1f1d1c −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"Fellix","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"Fellix","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"Fellix","size":36} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"Fellix","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
button 8px → 10px ~
card 24px → 18px spacing identical
No differences.