Diff

Sourcegraph vs Groq

56 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#1a1817 #f3f3ee
Text
#ededed #2d2f33
Brand
#f34e3f #f43e01
Border
#34302d #dbe2f0
Display font
PolySans Space Grotesk
Body size
16px 16px
colors 50 changed
~ bg #1a1817 #f3f3ee
~ surface #222222 #e8e8de
~ text #ededed #2d2f33
~ text-muted #a0a0a0 #64748b
~ text-faint #7a7672 #9498a0
~ brand #f34e3f #f43e01
~ brand-hover #ff6354 #d83602
~ brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) #fde4da
~ link #f34e3f #2d2f33
~ link-hover #ff6354 #f43e01
~ border #34302d #dbe2f0
~ border-strong #48433f #c4cbd9
+ bg-warm #ecece4
+ surface-card #fffcfc
+ surface-dark #2a2a25
+ surface-darker #1f1f1b
+ text-body #3a3c40
+ text-on-brand #ffffff
+ text-on-dark #f3f3ee
+ text-on-dark-muted #b8b8ae
+ brand-active #bf2f02
+ brand-deep #9e2701
+ dark #2a2a25
+ dark-hover #1f1f1b
+ border-warm #d8d8cd
+ shadow-color rgba(31, 31, 27, 0.05)
+ shadow-color-md rgba(31, 31, 27, 0.08)
+ shadow-color-lg rgba(31, 31, 27, 0.12)
+ shadow-glow-orange rgba(244, 62, 1, 0.18)
+ success #16a34a
+ warning #d97706
+ danger #dc2626
+ info #0ea5e9
bg-soft #211f1d
bg-elev #252321
surface-soft #1f1d1c
surface-strong #2c2a28
text-strong #ffffff
text-soft #b8b8b8
brand-emphasis #d63b2d
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e
border-soft #2a2724
focus-ring #f34e3f
semantic-success #4ec77f
semantic-warning #e0a64b
semantic-danger #f34e3f
semantic-info #5aa9f0
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14)
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14)
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55)
typography 5 changed
~ display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} {"family":"Space Grotesk","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} {"family":"Space Grotesk","size":32}
~ h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} {"family":"Space Grotesk","size":32}
~ body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} {"family":"Space Grotesk","size":16}
~ label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} {"family":"IBM Plex Mono","size":13}
radius 1 changed
~ card 24px 12px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Groq → Sourcegraph