Diff

Sourcegraph vs Glif

52 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#1a1817 #fcfaf6
Text
#ededed #0e0e10
Brand
#f34e3f #2e9e4f
Border
#34302d #0000000f
Display font
PolySans Manrope
Body size
16px 16px
colors 47 changed
~ bg #1a1817 #fcfaf6
~ bg-soft #211f1d #f6f3ec
~ bg-elev #252321 #f1ede4
~ surface #222222 #ffffff
~ text #ededed #0e0e10
~ text-strong #ffffff #000000
~ text-soft #b8b8b8 #86868c
~ text-muted #a0a0a0 #55555a
~ text-faint #7a7672 #b8b8be
~ brand #f34e3f #2e9e4f
~ brand-hover #ff6354 #28893f
~ brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) #e6f4ea
~ on-brand #ffffff #fffaef
~ border #34302d #0000000f
~ border-strong #48433f #0000001f
+ surface-2 #f6f3ec
+ surface-3 #ebe6db
+ brand-active #22742f
+ accent-warm #fffbf6
+ accent-warm-deep #f3ece0
+ accent-lilac #efeaff
+ accent-sky #e6f1fb
+ border-subtle #00000008
+ border-focus #2e9e4f
+ success #2e9e4f
+ success-bg #e6f4ea
+ warning #d98a00
+ warning-bg #fdf2dc
+ danger #d83a3a
+ danger-bg #fbe7e7
+ info #2e9e4f
+ info-bg #e6f4ea
surface-soft #1f1d1c
surface-strong #2c2a28
brand-emphasis #d63b2d
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e
link #f34e3f
link-hover #ff6354
border-soft #2a2724
focus-ring #f34e3f
semantic-success #4ec77f
semantic-warning #e0a64b
semantic-danger #f34e3f
semantic-info #5aa9f0
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14)
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14)
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55)
typography 4 changed
~ display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} {"family":"Manrope","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} {"family":"Manrope","size":54}
~ h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} {"family":"Manrope","size":40}
~ body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} {"family":"Manrope","size":16}
radius 1 changed
~ card 24px 12px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Glif → Sourcegraph