Sourcegraph vs Craft
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #fcf9f7 Text
#ededed → #030302 Brand
#f34e3f → #030302 Border
#34302d → rgba(3, 3, 2, 0.09) Display font
PolySans → Untitled Serif Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #fcf9f7 ~
bg-soft #211f1d → #f7f2ee ~
surface #222222 → #ffffff ~
text #ededed → #030302 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #030302 ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #8a8782 ~
brand #f34e3f → #030302 ~
brand-hover #ff6354 → #1c1b19 ~
border #34302d → rgba(3, 3, 2, 0.09) ~
border-soft #2a2724 → rgba(3, 3, 2, 0.05) ~
border-strong #48433f → rgba(3, 3, 2, 0.16) +
surface-elev #fbf7f4 +
text-body #3a3835 +
text-secondary #5c5a57 +
accent-blue #2563eb +
accent-blue-hover #1d4ed8 +
accent-blue-soft #e8effe +
accent-blue-deep #1e40af +
shadow-card rgba(36, 30, 24, 0.05) +
shadow-elev rgba(36, 30, 24, 0.10) +
scrim rgba(18, 16, 14, 0.45) +
success #2f7d4f +
success-soft #e8f3ec +
warning #9a6212 +
warning-soft #fbf0dc +
danger #c0382e +
danger-soft #f9e6e3 +
info #2563eb +
info-soft #e8effe −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-soft #1f1d1c −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
text-soft #b8b8b8 −
text-faint #7a7672 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
link #f34e3f −
link-hover #ff6354 −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"Untitled Serif","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"Untitled Serif","size":66} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"Untitled Serif","size":54} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"Untitled Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} radius 2 changed
~
button 8px → 12px ~
card 24px → 16px spacing identical
No differences.