Sourcegraph vs Anytype
56 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#1a1817 → #000000 Text
#ededed → #ffffff Brand
#f34e3f → #3cd9b3 Border
#34302d → #262626 Display font
PolySans → Riccione Body size
16px → 16px colors 51 changed
~
bg #1a1817 → #000000 ~
surface #222222 → #0d0d0d ~
text #ededed → #ffffff ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #7a7672 → #5c5c5c ~
brand #f34e3f → #3cd9b3 ~
brand-hover #ff6354 → #2fc4a0 ~
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) → #0e2b25 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #000000 ~
border #34302d → #262626 ~
border-soft #2a2724 → #1a1a1a ~
border-strong #48433f → #3a3a3a +
bg-deep #000000 +
surface-elev #1a1a1a +
surface-hover #242424 +
text-secondary #b8b8b8 +
brand-active #27a98a +
brand-text #3cd9b3 +
any-teal #3cd9b3 +
any-blue #18a3f1 +
any-green #4cad00 +
any-amber #ffb522 +
border-brand #3cd9b3 +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) +
success #4cad00 +
success-soft #0f2200 +
warning #ffb522 +
warning-soft #2a1d00 +
danger #ff6a7b +
danger-soft #2e1115 +
info #18a3f1 −
bg-soft #211f1d −
bg-elev #252321 −
surface-soft #1f1d1c −
surface-strong #2c2a28 −
text-soft #b8b8b8 −
brand-emphasis #d63b2d −
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e −
link #f34e3f −
link-hover #ff6354 −
focus-ring #f34e3f −
semantic-success #4ec77f −
semantic-warning #e0a64b −
semantic-danger #f34e3f −
semantic-info #5aa9f0 −
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) −
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) −
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"PolySans","size":80} → {"family":"Riccione","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"PolySans","size":48} → {"family":"Riccione","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"PolySans","size":36} → {"family":"Riccione","size":36} ~
body {"family":"PolySans","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 24px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.