shadcn/ui vs Coda
59 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#0a0a0a → #212121 Brand
#0a0a0a → #0066ff Border
#e4e4e7 → #e3e3e3 Display font
Geist → Calibre-R Body size
16px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
surface #fafafa → #ffffff ~
surface-muted #f4f4f5 → #f0f0f0 ~
text #0a0a0a → #212121 ~
text-muted #71717a → #444444 ~
text-faint #a1a1aa → #717171 ~
brand #0a0a0a → #0066ff ~
brand-hover #1a1a1a → #0052cc ~
on-brand #fafafa → #ffffff ~
border #e4e4e7 → #e3e3e3 ~
border-soft #f4f4f5 → #ededed ~
border-strong #d4d4d8 → #cccccc ~
success #10b981 → #1a7f4b ~
warning #f59e0b → #9a6400 ~
info #3b82f6 → #0066ff +
surface-soft #fafafa +
brand-soft #e6efff +
cta-primary #000000 +
accent #f8ad40 +
accent-cream #fff6ec +
accent-callout #ffe6c9 +
accent-warm #f0e5dc +
block-green #006838 +
success-bg #e7f4ec +
warning-bg #fff3df +
danger #c0392b +
danger-bg #fbeae8 +
info-bg #e6efff −
surface-strong #f4f4f5 −
surface-accent #f4f4f5 −
surface-elevated #ffffff −
text-strong #000000 −
text-secondary #3f3f46 −
brand-active #27272a −
link #0a0a0a −
link-hover #3f3f46 −
destructive #ef4444 −
destructive-hover #dc2626 −
destructive-foreground #fafafa −
input #e4e4e7 −
input-border #e4e4e7 −
ring #0a0a0a −
selection-bg rgba(10, 10, 10, 0.1) −
shadow-color rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.05) −
shadow-color-md rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1) −
shadow-color-lg rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15) −
chart-1 #e76e50 −
chart-2 #2a9d90 −
chart-3 #274754 −
chart-4 #e8c468 −
chart-5 #f4a462 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Geist","size":56} → {"family":"Calibre-R","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Geist","size":40} → {"family":"Calibre-R","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Geist","size":32} → {"family":"Calibre-R","size":38} ~
body {"family":"Geist","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} ~
label {"family":"Geist Mono","size":14} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px ~
xl 48px → 64px