SAP vs Magic
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#1d2d3e → #1c2024 Brand
#0070f2 → #0090ff Border
#d8dee5 → #e8e8ec Display font
72 → Aeonik Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
surface-soft #f5f6f7 → #fcfcfd ~
brand #0070f2 → #0090ff ~
brand-hover #0040b0 → #0586f0 ~
text #1d2d3e → #1c2024 ~
text-strong #0a2540 → #1c2024 ~
text-faint #8b95a3 → #80838d ~
border #d8dee5 → #e8e8ec ~
border-soft #eaecee → #f0f0f3 ~
border-strong #a8b1bd → #d9d9e0 ~
link #0070f2 → #0d74ce ~
link-hover #0040b0 → #0090ff ~
success #36a41d → #2c8849 ~
warning #e76500 → #bb6a00 ~
danger #d20a0a → #c62a44 ~
info #0070f2 → #0090ff +
surface-muted #f9f9fb +
text-body #2c2d2f +
text-muted #60646c +
text-disabled #8b8d98 +
brand-strong #0d74ce +
brand-ink #113264 +
border-translucent rgba(0, 8, 48, 0.094) +
diff-insert-bg #ecfdee +
diff-delete-bg #feeced +
diff-delete-surface #fcf7f8 +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 5, 9, 0.06) −
bg-soft #f5f6f7 −
bg-section #eaecee −
bg-feature #1d2d3e −
bg-footer #1d2d3e −
bg-cool #ebf8ff −
surface-elev #ffffff −
brand-active #002a77 −
brand-subtle #d1efff −
brand-soft #ebf8ff −
navy #1d2d3e −
navy-deep #0a2540 −
text-soft #556270 −
text-on-dark #ffffff −
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78) −
link-visited #5d36ff −
success-soft #e9f8ec −
warning-soft #fff3e0 −
danger-soft #fde1e1 −
info-soft #ebf8ff −
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55) −
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10) −
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"72","size":72} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":64} ~
h1 {"family":"72","size":44} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":46} ~
h2 {"family":"72","size":36} → {"family":"Aeonik","size":34} ~
body {"family":"72","size":16} → {"family":"Suisse Intl","size":16} ~
label {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px ~
xl 48px → 64px