SAP vs Amplitude
57 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#1d2d3e → #565656 Brand
#0070f2 → #1e61f0 Border
#d8dee5 → #e3e6ea Display font
72 → IBM Plex Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg-soft #f5f6f7 → #f7f8f9 ~
bg-cool #ebf8ff → #f2f4f7 ~
brand #0070f2 → #1e61f0 ~
brand-hover #0040b0 → #1850cf ~
brand-soft #ebf8ff → #eaf0fe ~
text #1d2d3e → #565656 ~
text-strong #0a2540 → #000000 ~
text-soft #556270 → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #8b95a3 → #a8a8a8 ~
border #d8dee5 → #e3e6ea ~
border-soft #eaecee → #eef0f3 ~
border-strong #a8b1bd → #cfd4da ~
link #0070f2 → #1e61f0 ~
link-hover #0040b0 → #1850cf ~
success #36a41d → #1f9d57 ~
warning #e76500 → #c77700 ~
danger #d20a0a → #d33b3b ~
info #0070f2 → #1e61f0 +
surface-hover #f7f8f9 +
bg-dark #1a1f23 +
bg-deep #0c0e10 +
text-muted #6e6e6e +
text-on-dark-muted #b4b8bc +
brand-deep #1543ad +
brand-tint rgba(30, 97, 240, 0.10) +
cta-black #000000 +
cta-black-hover #1a1f23 +
on-cta-black #ffffff +
border-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.12) −
bg-section #eaecee −
bg-feature #1d2d3e −
bg-footer #1d2d3e −
surface-soft #f5f6f7 −
surface-elev #ffffff −
brand-active #002a77 −
brand-subtle #d1efff −
navy #1d2d3e −
navy-deep #0a2540 −
text-on-dark-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.78) −
link-visited #5d36ff −
success-soft #e9f8ec −
warning-soft #fff3e0 −
danger-soft #fde1e1 −
info-soft #ebf8ff −
scrim rgba(29,45,62,0.55) −
shadow-card rgba(29,45,62,0.10) −
shadow-elev rgba(29,45,62,0.18) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.20) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"72","size":72} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"72","size":44} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"72","size":36} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":44} ~
body {"family":"72","size":16} → {"family":"IBM Plex Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"72 Mono","size":14} → {"family":"IBM Plex Mono","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 4px → 0px ~
sm 8px → 4px ~
md 16px → 12px ~
xl 48px → 64px