Pitch vs Hyperliquid
47 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #04060c Text
#000000 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) Brand
#5318eb → #97fce4 Border
#e4e2ee → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) Display font
Mark Pro Bold → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 42 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #04060c ~
surface #0a0a0a → #0a0d16 ~
text #000000 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) ~
text-muted #5b5b66 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.60) ~
brand #5318eb → #97fce4 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #04060c ~
link #0000ee → #97fce4 ~
link-hover #3a0fab → #50d2c1 ~
border #e4e2ee → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) ~
border-strong #cbc8da → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.28) +
bg-elev-1 #0a0d16 +
bg-elev-2 #121622 +
bg-elev-3 #1a1f2e +
surface-row-hover #121622 +
text-body rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.78) +
text-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45) +
brand-strong #50d2c1 +
brand-deep #2fa89a +
brand-soft rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.12) +
brand-glow rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.35) +
border-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
border-brand #97fce4 +
semantic-up #3fd68b +
semantic-up-soft rgba(63, 214, 139, 0.14) +
semantic-down #ff5470 +
semantic-down-soft rgba(255, 84, 112, 0.14) +
semantic-warning #ffd25f +
semantic-info #97fce4 +
focus-ring rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.55) +
scrim rgba(2, 3, 7, 0.78) −
bg-hero #000000 −
surface-light #f6f5fb −
text-on-hero #ffffff −
text-muted-on-hero #a8a8b3 −
brand-hover #4512c9 −
brand-active #3a0fab −
brand-tint #ebe3fe −
border-on-hero #26262e −
success #16a34a −
warning #d97706 −
danger #dc2626 −
info #5318eb typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":180} → {"family":"Inter","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":56} → {"family":"Inter","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Mark Pro Bold","size":40} → {"family":"Inter","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Mark Pro","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":14} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.