Picoko vs Shortwave
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fbfaf8 → #0c0e16 Text
#121110 → #ffffff Brand
#fe1c71 → #356aff Border
rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) → rgba(255,255,255,0.08) Display font
Outfit → Poppins Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #fbfaf8 → #0c0e16 ~
surface #ffffff → #161922 ~
text #121110 → #ffffff ~
text-strong #0a0909 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #6b6663 → #9aa3b8 ~
text-soft #9c9793 → #c4cad8 ~
brand #fe1c71 → #356aff ~
brand-soft rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.10) → #7d9bff ~
border rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) → rgba(255,255,255,0.08) ~
border-strong rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.16) → rgba(255,255,255,0.16) +
bg-elev #11141d +
surface-elev #1d212c +
brand-hover #2a59e6 +
brand-tint rgba(53,106,255,0.12) +
border-soft rgba(255,255,255,0.04) +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.32) +
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.48) +
shadow-brand rgba(53,106,255,0.30) +
scrim rgba(6,7,12,0.72) +
success #3ecf8e +
success-soft rgba(62,207,142,0.14) +
warning #f0b429 +
warning-soft rgba(240,180,41,0.14) +
danger #ff5c5c +
danger-soft rgba(255,92,92,0.14) +
info #356aff +
info-soft rgba(53,106,255,0.14) −
bg-alt #f5f3f0 −
surface-soft #f9f8f6 −
surface-elevated #ffffff −
text-faint #c3bfbb −
brand-deep #e5005c −
link #121110 −
link-hover #fe1c71 −
selected-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) −
disabled #c3bfbb −
border-subtle rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.04) −
border-brand rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.30) −
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.10) −
success-text #15803d −
warning-bg rgba(234, 179, 8, 0.12) −
warning-text #a16207 −
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.10) −
danger-text #b91c1c −
info-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) −
info-text #c0004e typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Outfit","size":72} → {"family":"Poppins","size":64} ~
h1 {"family":"Outfit","size":48} → {"family":"Poppins","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Outfit","size":36} → {"family":"Poppins","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Outfit","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
card 16px → 12px ~
pill 32px → 9999px spacing identical
No differences.