Picoko vs Hume AI
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fbfaf8 → #fff9f3 Text
#121110 → #222222 Brand
#fe1c71 → #222222 Border
rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) → #e7dccd Display font
Outfit → Fellix Body size
16px → 16px colors 45 changed
~
bg #fbfaf8 → #fff9f3 ~
surface #ffffff → #f7ede1 ~
text #121110 → #222222 ~
text-strong #0a0909 → #000000 ~
text-muted #6b6663 → #5c554e ~
text-soft #9c9793 → #7a7269 ~
text-faint #c3bfbb → #a89e92 ~
brand #fe1c71 → #222222 ~
brand-soft rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.10) → #3a3633 ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fff9f3 ~
link #121110 → #222222 ~
link-hover #fe1c71 → #000000 ~
selected-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) → #f3e7da ~
border rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) → #e7dccd ~
border-strong rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.16) → #d9cdbb ~
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.10) → #e3efe0 ~
success-text #15803d → #3f6b3a ~
warning-bg rgba(234, 179, 8, 0.12) → #fbeecf ~
warning-text #a16207 → #8a6420 ~
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.10) → #f7e0db ~
danger-text #b91c1c → #a4362a ~
info-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) → #e8e6e3 ~
info-text #c0004e → #3a3633 +
bg-soft #fdf4ec +
surface-strong #efe2d2 +
surface-hover #f4e8da +
text-medium #3a3633 +
on-cta #fff9f3 +
brand-hover #000000 +
accent #e8d5c4 +
accent-deep #d9bfa6 +
accent-faint #f3e7da +
disabled-bg #f4e8da +
disabled-text #a89e92 +
border-soft #f0e6d9 +
border-focus #222222 +
shadow-rgb 34, 28, 22 +
shadow-warm 160, 120, 80 −
bg-alt #f5f3f0 −
surface-soft #f9f8f6 −
surface-elevated #ffffff −
brand-deep #e5005c −
disabled #c3bfbb −
border-subtle rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.04) −
border-brand rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.30) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Outfit","size":72} → {"family":"Fellix","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Outfit","size":48} → {"family":"Fellix","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Outfit","size":36} → {"family":"Fellix","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Outfit","size":16} → {"family":"Fellix","size":16} radius 3 changed
~
button 8px → 10px ~
card 16px → 18px ~
pill 32px → 9999px spacing identical
No differences.