Patagonia vs Sourcegraph
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f6efe1 → #1a1817 Text
#1c1c1c → #ededed Brand
#cd0000 → #f34e3f Border
#d8d0bc → #34302d Display font
Futura PT → PolySans Body size
16px → 16px colors 46 changed
~
bg #f6efe1 → #1a1817 ~
bg-soft #fdf9ed → #211f1d ~
surface #ffffff → #222222 ~
surface-soft #fbf8ed → #1f1d1c ~
brand #cd0000 → #f34e3f ~
brand-hover #a80000 → #ff6354 ~
text #1c1c1c → #ededed ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5a5a5a → #a0a0a0 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #b8b8b8 ~
text-faint #bcbcbc → #7a7672 ~
link #cd0000 → #f34e3f ~
link-hover #820000 → #ff6354 ~
border #d8d0bc → #34302d ~
border-strong #bcb09a → #48433f ~
border-soft #e8e0c8 → #2a2724 +
bg-elev #252321 +
surface-strong #2c2a28 +
brand-emphasis #d63b2d +
brand-soft rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) +
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e +
focus-ring #f34e3f +
semantic-success #4ec77f +
semantic-warning #e0a64b +
semantic-danger #f34e3f +
semantic-info #5aa9f0 +
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) +
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) −
bg-deeper #ebe3d0 −
bg-warm #f9f3e3 −
surface-deeper #ede5d0 −
brand-pressed #820000 −
brand-deep #5a0000 −
brand-tint #fde0e0 −
forest #3d4a2e −
forest-deep #293421 −
forest-soft #dde3d4 −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
selected-bg #fde0e0 −
border-brand #cd0000 −
amber #cb9c45 −
success #3d4a2e −
warning #cb9c45 −
danger #a80000 −
info #3d4a2e typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Futura PT","size":80} → {"family":"PolySans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Futura PT","size":36} → {"family":"PolySans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Futura PT","size":28} → {"family":"PolySans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Futura PT","size":16} → {"family":"PolySans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius 2 changed
~
button 4px → 8px ~
card 14px → 24px spacing 2 changed
~
lg 24px → 32px ~
xl 40px → 64px