Patagonia vs Accenture
58 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#f6efe1 → #0a0a0a Text
#1c1c1c → #ffffff Brand
#cd0000 → #a600ff Border
#d8d0bc → #2e2e2e Display font
Futura PT → Graphik Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #f6efe1 → #0a0a0a ~
surface #ffffff → #141414 ~
surface-soft #fbf8ed → #1c1c1c ~
brand #cd0000 → #a600ff ~
brand-deep #5a0000 → #7d00c4 ~
text #1c1c1c → #ffffff ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5a5a5a → #a3a3a3 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #6b6b6b ~
link #cd0000 → #ffffff ~
link-hover #820000 → #a600ff ~
border #d8d0bc → #2e2e2e ~
border-strong #bcb09a → #4d4d4d ~
success #3d4a2e → #3ad29f ~
warning #cb9c45 → #ffb800 ~
danger #a80000 → #ff5252 ~
info #3d4a2e → #a600ff +
bg-pure #000000 +
surface-strong #262626 +
surface-light #ffffff +
surface-light-soft #f2f2f2 +
text-body #e6e6e6 +
text-on-light #0a0a0a +
text-on-light-mute #525252 +
brand-bright #be4bff +
brand-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) +
border-on-light #e0e0e0 +
focus #a600ff +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.7) +
success-soft rgba(58,210,159,0.14) +
warning-soft rgba(255,184,0,0.14) +
danger-soft rgba(255,82,82,0.14) +
info-soft rgba(166,0,255,0.12) −
bg-soft #fdf9ed −
bg-deeper #ebe3d0 −
bg-warm #f9f3e3 −
surface-deeper #ede5d0 −
brand-hover #a80000 −
brand-pressed #820000 −
brand-tint #fde0e0 −
forest #3d4a2e −
forest-deep #293421 −
forest-soft #dde3d4 −
text-faint #bcbcbc −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
selected-bg #fde0e0 −
border-soft #e8e0c8 −
border-brand #cd0000 −
amber #cb9c45 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Futura PT","size":80} → {"family":"Graphik","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Futura PT","size":36} → {"family":"Graphik","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Futura PT","size":28} → {"family":"Graphik","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Futura PT","size":16} → {"family":"Graphik","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":12} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius 2 changed
~
button 4px → 8px ~
card 14px → 12px spacing 2 changed
~
lg 24px → 32px ~
xl 40px → 64px