Obsidian vs Udio
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0f0f0f → #000000 Text
#eeeeee → #f9f9f9 Brand
#7c3aed → #e30b5d Border
#2a2a2a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
Inter → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg #0f0f0f → #000000 ~
surface #161616 → #0a0a0a ~
text #eeeeee → #f9f9f9 ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #c2c2c2 ~
brand #7c3aed → #e30b5d ~
brand-soft #2a1a4a → rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) ~
border #2a2a2a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) +
bg-alt #08080a +
surface-soft rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
text-soft #8a8a8a +
brand-deep #c2094f +
link #f9f9f9 +
link-hover #e30b5d +
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
disabled #737373 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) +
warning-text #fcd34d +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
info-text #c2c2c2 −
bg-deep #0a0a0a −
surface-elev #1f1f1f −
surface-hover #262626 −
text-secondary #b0b0b0 −
brand-hover #6d28d9 −
brand-active #5b21b6 −
brand-text #a78bfa −
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd −
border-soft #1f1f1f −
border-brand #7c3aed −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
success #4ade80 −
success-soft #14321f −
warning #fbbf24 −
warning-soft #33270a −
danger #f87171 −
danger-soft #3a1717 −
info #a78bfa typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":60} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.