Obsidian vs Storybook
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0f0f0f → #ffffff Text
#eeeeee → #000000 Brand
#7c3aed → #ff4785 Border
#2a2a2a → #e5e7eb Display font
Inter → Nunito Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #0f0f0f → #ffffff ~
surface #161616 → #ffffff ~
text #eeeeee → #000000 ~
text-secondary #b0b0b0 → #454545 ~
text-faint #737373 → #9aa5ad ~
brand #7c3aed → #ff4785 ~
brand-hover #6d28d9 → #e63a73 ~
brand-soft #2a1a4a → rgba(255, 71, 133, 0.10) ~
border #2a2a2a → #e5e7eb ~
border-soft #1f1f1f → #f1f3f5 ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → #cdd2d6 ~
success #4ade80 → #66bf3c ~
success-soft #14321f → rgba(102, 191, 60, 0.10) ~
warning #fbbf24 → #e69d00 ~
warning-soft #33270a → rgba(230, 157, 0, 0.10) ~
danger #f87171 → #ff4400 ~
danger-soft #3a1717 → rgba(255, 68, 0, 0.10) ~
info #a78bfa → #1ea7fd +
bg-elev #f8f9fa +
bg-deeper #f1f3f5 +
surface-ink #0d1026 +
text-tertiary #73828c +
text-on-ink #ffffff +
text-on-ink-soft #b0b8c0 +
brand-deep #cc3066 +
brand-tint rgba(255, 71, 133, 0.06) +
link #ff4785 +
link-hover #e63a73 +
cta-bg #ffffff +
cta-text #000000 +
cta-bg-brand #ff4785 +
cta-text-brand #ffffff +
focus #ff4785 +
info-soft rgba(30, 167, 253, 0.10) −
bg-deep #0a0a0a −
surface-elev #1f1f1f −
surface-hover #262626 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-muted #a3a3a3 −
brand-active #5b21b6 −
brand-text #a78bfa −
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd −
border-brand #7c3aed −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":60} → {"family":"Nunito Sans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"Nunito Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"Nunito Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Nunito Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"Operator Mono","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.