Obsidian vs Sourcegraph
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0f0f0f → #1a1817 Text
#eeeeee → #ededed Brand
#7c3aed → #f34e3f Border
#2a2a2a → #34302d Display font
Inter → PolySans Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #0f0f0f → #1a1817 ~
surface #161616 → #222222 ~
text #eeeeee → #ededed ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #a0a0a0 ~
text-faint #737373 → #7a7672 ~
brand #7c3aed → #f34e3f ~
brand-hover #6d28d9 → #ff6354 ~
brand-soft #2a1a4a → rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.12) ~
border #2a2a2a → #34302d ~
border-soft #1f1f1f → #2a2724 ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → #48433f +
bg-soft #211f1d +
bg-elev #252321 +
surface-soft #1f1d1c +
surface-strong #2c2a28 +
text-soft #b8b8b8 +
brand-emphasis #d63b2d +
brand-soft-fg #ff7a6e +
link #f34e3f +
link-hover #ff6354 +
focus-ring #f34e3f +
semantic-success #4ec77f +
semantic-warning #e0a64b +
semantic-danger #f34e3f +
semantic-info #5aa9f0 +
diff-add-bg rgba(78, 199, 127, 0.14) +
diff-remove-bg rgba(243, 78, 63, 0.14) +
shadow-tint rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.55) −
bg-deep #0a0a0a −
surface-elev #1f1f1f −
surface-hover #262626 −
text-secondary #b0b0b0 −
brand-active #5b21b6 −
brand-text #a78bfa −
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd −
border-brand #7c3aed −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
success #4ade80 −
success-soft #14321f −
warning #fbbf24 −
warning-soft #33270a −
danger #f87171 −
danger-soft #3a1717 −
info #a78bfa typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":60} → {"family":"PolySans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"PolySans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"PolySans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"PolySans","size":16} radius 1 changed
~
card 12px → 24px spacing identical
No differences.