Obsidian vs Picoko
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0f0f0f → #fbfaf8 Text
#eeeeee → #121110 Brand
#7c3aed → #fe1c71 Border
#2a2a2a → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) Display font
Inter → Outfit Body size
16px → 16px colors 49 changed
~
bg #0f0f0f → #fbfaf8 ~
surface #161616 → #ffffff ~
text #eeeeee → #121110 ~
text-strong #ffffff → #0a0909 ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → #6b6663 ~
text-faint #737373 → #c3bfbb ~
brand #7c3aed → #fe1c71 ~
brand-soft #2a1a4a → rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.10) ~
border #2a2a2a → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.08) ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.16) ~
border-brand #7c3aed → rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.30) +
bg-alt #f5f3f0 +
surface-soft #f9f8f6 +
surface-elevated #ffffff +
text-soft #9c9793 +
brand-deep #e5005c +
link #121110 +
link-hover #fe1c71 +
selected-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) +
disabled #c3bfbb +
border-subtle rgba(18, 17, 16, 0.04) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.10) +
success-text #15803d +
warning-bg rgba(234, 179, 8, 0.12) +
warning-text #a16207 +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.10) +
danger-text #b91c1c +
info-bg rgba(254, 28, 113, 0.08) +
info-text #c0004e −
bg-deep #0a0a0a −
surface-elev #1f1f1f −
surface-hover #262626 −
text-secondary #b0b0b0 −
brand-hover #6d28d9 −
brand-active #5b21b6 −
brand-text #a78bfa −
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd −
border-soft #1f1f1f −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) −
success #4ade80 −
success-soft #14321f −
warning #fbbf24 −
warning-soft #33270a −
danger #f87171 −
danger-soft #3a1717 −
info #a78bfa typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":60} → {"family":"Outfit","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"Outfit","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"Outfit","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"Outfit","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
card 12px → 16px ~
pill 9999px → 32px spacing identical
No differences.