Obsidian vs Hyperliquid
51 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0f0f0f → #04060c Text
#eeeeee → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) Brand
#7c3aed → #97fce4 Border
#2a2a2a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) Display font
Inter → Inter Body size
16px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
bg #0f0f0f → #04060c ~
surface #161616 → #0a0d16 ~
text #eeeeee → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.92) ~
text-muted #a3a3a3 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.60) ~
brand #7c3aed → #97fce4 ~
brand-soft #2a1a4a → rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.12) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #04060c ~
border #2a2a2a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.16) ~
border-soft #1f1f1f → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) ~
border-strong #3a3a3a → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.28) ~
border-brand #7c3aed → #97fce4 ~
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.65) → rgba(2, 3, 7, 0.78) +
bg-elev-1 #0a0d16 +
bg-elev-2 #121622 +
bg-elev-3 #1a1f2e +
surface-row-hover #121622 +
text-body rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.78) +
text-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.45) +
brand-strong #50d2c1 +
brand-deep #2fa89a +
brand-glow rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.35) +
semantic-up #3fd68b +
semantic-up-soft rgba(63, 214, 139, 0.14) +
semantic-down #ff5470 +
semantic-down-soft rgba(255, 84, 112, 0.14) +
semantic-warning #ffd25f +
semantic-info #97fce4 +
focus-ring rgba(151, 252, 228, 0.55) +
link #97fce4 +
link-hover #50d2c1 −
bg-deep #0a0a0a −
surface-elev #1f1f1f −
surface-hover #262626 −
text-strong #ffffff −
text-secondary #b0b0b0 −
text-faint #737373 −
brand-hover #6d28d9 −
brand-active #5b21b6 −
brand-text #a78bfa −
brand-text-hover #c4b5fd −
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.40) −
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.50) −
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.70) −
success #4ade80 −
success-soft #14321f −
warning #fbbf24 −
warning-soft #33270a −
danger #f87171 −
danger-soft #3a1717 −
info #a78bfa typography 1 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":60} → {"family":"Inter","size":80} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.