Jupiter vs Graphite
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#090d10 → #070707 Text
#ffffff → #fafafa Brand
#c7f284 → #3b82f6 Border
#1c2530 → #1f1f1f Display font
Inter → matterFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 51 changed
~
bg #090d10 → #070707 ~
surface #19242e → #0f0f0f ~
surface-strong #212a36 → #171717 ~
brand #c7f284 → #3b82f6 ~
brand-hover #d5f79c → #60a5fa ~
brand-soft rgba(199, 242, 132, 0.25) → rgba(59,130,246,0.16) ~
on-brand #090d10 → #ffffff ~
text #ffffff → #fafafa ~
link #c7f284 → #60a5fa ~
link-hover #d5f79c → #93c5fd ~
border #1c2530 → #1f1f1f ~
border-strong #2a3542 → #2e2e2e ~
border-brand #c7f284 → #3b82f6 ~
success #4ade80 → #22c55e ~
warning #fbbf24 → #f59e0b ~
danger #f87171 → #ef4444 ~
info #60a5fa → #3b82f6 +
bg-level-1 #0f0f0f +
bg-level-2 #171717 +
bg-level-3 #1f1f1f +
bg-overlay rgba(7,7,7,0.72) +
surface-tinted-brand rgba(59,130,246,0.08) +
text-secondary #d4d4d4 +
text-tertiary #a3a3a3 +
text-quaternary #737373 +
text-disabled #525252 +
brand-press #2f6fed +
accent #60a5fa +
border-subtle rgba(255,255,255,0.06) +
cta-fill #262626 +
cta-fill-hover #2e2e2e +
cta-fill-press #1f1f1f +
cta-text #fafafa +
success-bg rgba(34,197,94,0.12) +
warning-bg rgba(245,158,11,0.12) +
danger-bg rgba(239,68,68,0.12) +
info-bg rgba(59,130,246,0.12) −
bg-deep #05080a −
bg-section #0d1318 −
surface-soft #111922 −
brand-pressed #b6e96a −
brand-deep #9fd34f −
brand-tint rgba(199, 242, 132, 0.10) −
text-bright #e2e8f0 −
text-muted #cad5e2 −
text-soft #90a1b9 −
text-faint #62748e −
selected-bg rgba(199, 242, 132, 0.12) −
border-soft #141c24 −
connect-bg #212a36 −
connect-text #cad5e2 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Inter","size":80} → {"family":"matterFont","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"Inter","size":40} → {"family":"matterFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"Inter","size":32} → {"family":"matterFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"matterFont","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.