Hume AI vs Anytype
65 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fff9f3 → #000000 Text
#222222 → #ffffff Brand
#222222 → #3cd9b3 Border
#e7dccd → #262626 Display font
Fellix → Riccione Body size
16px → 16px colors 59 changed
~
bg #fff9f3 → #000000 ~
surface #f7ede1 → #0d0d0d ~
surface-hover #f4e8da → #242424 ~
text #222222 → #ffffff ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5c554e → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #a89e92 → #5c5c5c ~
on-brand #fff9f3 → #000000 ~
brand #222222 → #3cd9b3 ~
brand-hover #000000 → #2fc4a0 ~
brand-soft #3a3633 → #0e2b25 ~
border #e7dccd → #262626 ~
border-strong #d9cdbb → #3a3a3a ~
border-soft #f0e6d9 → #1a1a1a +
bg-deep #000000 +
surface-elev #1a1a1a +
text-secondary #b8b8b8 +
brand-active #27a98a +
brand-text #3cd9b3 +
any-teal #3cd9b3 +
any-blue #18a3f1 +
any-green #4cad00 +
any-amber #ffb522 +
border-brand #3cd9b3 +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) +
success #4cad00 +
success-soft #0f2200 +
warning #ffb522 +
warning-soft #2a1d00 +
danger #ff6a7b +
danger-soft #2e1115 +
info #18a3f1 −
bg-soft #fdf4ec −
surface-strong #efe2d2 −
text-medium #3a3633 −
text-soft #7a7269 −
on-cta #fff9f3 −
accent #e8d5c4 −
accent-deep #d9bfa6 −
accent-faint #f3e7da −
link #222222 −
link-hover #000000 −
selected-bg #f3e7da −
disabled-bg #f4e8da −
disabled-text #a89e92 −
border-focus #222222 −
success-bg #e3efe0 −
success-text #3f6b3a −
warning-bg #fbeecf −
warning-text #8a6420 −
danger-bg #f7e0db −
danger-text #a4362a −
info-bg #e8e6e3 −
info-text #3a3633 −
shadow-rgb 34, 28, 22 −
shadow-warm 160, 120, 80 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Fellix","size":80} → {"family":"Riccione","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"Fellix","size":48} → {"family":"Riccione","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Fellix","size":36} → {"family":"Riccione","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Fellix","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
button 10px → 8px ~
card 18px → 12px spacing identical
No differences.