Glif vs Meta
59 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fcfaf6 → #ffffff Text
#0e0e10 → #1c2b33 Brand
#2e9e4f → #0467df Border
#0000000f → #dddfe2 Display font
Manrope → Optimistic Display Body size
16px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
bg #fcfaf6 → #ffffff ~
bg-soft #f6f3ec → #f5f5f5 ~
text #0e0e10 → #1c2b33 ~
text-strong #000000 → #0a1014 ~
text-muted #55555a → #65676b ~
text-soft #86868c → #8a8d91 ~
brand #2e9e4f → #0467df ~
brand-hover #28893f → #0356b8 ~
brand-active #22742f → #024187 ~
brand-soft #e6f4ea → #e7f3ff ~
on-brand #fffaef → #ffffff ~
border #0000000f → #dddfe2 ~
border-strong #0000001f → #1c2b33 ~
success #2e9e4f → #42b72a ~
warning #d98a00 → #f7b928 ~
danger #d83a3a → #fa3e3e ~
info #2e9e4f → #0467df +
bg-deep #1c2b33 +
surface-soft #f5f5f5 +
surface-strong #ebedf0 +
surface-tint #f0f4fa +
text-on-dark #ffffff +
text-on-dark-muted #b0b3b8 +
accent-instagram #e4405f +
accent-whatsapp #25d366 +
accent-quest #000000 +
accent-threads #000000 +
border-soft #e4e6eb +
link #0467df +
link-hover #0356b8 +
scrim rgba(28,43,51,0.7) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.08) +
success-soft #e9f7e2 +
warning-soft #fff8e1 +
danger-soft #ffeaea +
info-soft #e7f3ff −
bg-elev #f1ede4 −
surface-2 #f6f3ec −
surface-3 #ebe6db −
text-faint #b8b8be −
accent-warm #fffbf6 −
accent-warm-deep #f3ece0 −
accent-lilac #efeaff −
accent-sky #e6f1fb −
border-subtle #00000008 −
border-focus #2e9e4f −
success-bg #e6f4ea −
warning-bg #fdf2dc −
danger-bg #fbe7e7 −
info-bg #e6f4ea typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Manrope","size":80} → {"family":"Optimistic Display","size":96} ~
h1 {"family":"Manrope","size":54} → {"family":"Optimistic Display","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Manrope","size":40} → {"family":"Optimistic Display","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Manrope","size":16} → {"family":"Meta Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"Optimistic Mono","size":11} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
xl 64px → 48px