Glif vs CodeSandbox
51 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#fcfaf6 → #0e0e0e Text
#0e0e10 → #f0f0f0 Brand
#2e9e4f → #eaff96 Border
#0000000f → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) Display font
Manrope → TWK Everett Body size
16px → 16px colors 47 changed
~
bg #fcfaf6 → #0e0e0e ~
surface #ffffff → #1d1d1d ~
text #0e0e10 → #f0f0f0 ~
text-strong #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #55555a → #a0a0a0 ~
text-soft #86868c → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #b8b8be → #5c5c5c ~
brand #2e9e4f → #eaff96 ~
brand-hover #28893f → #f1ffb0 ~
brand-soft #e6f4ea → rgba(234,255,150,0.14) ~
on-brand #fffaef → #343434 ~
border #0000000f → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) ~
border-strong #0000001f → rgba(240,240,240,0.18) ~
success #2e9e4f → #7ee787 ~
success-bg #e6f4ea → rgba(126,231,135,0.14) ~
warning #d98a00 → #f0b429 ~
warning-bg #fdf2dc → rgba(240,180,41,0.14) ~
danger #d83a3a → #ff6b6b ~
danger-bg #fbe7e7 → rgba(255,107,107,0.14) ~
info #2e9e4f → #e3ff73 +
bg-deep #080808 +
bg-elevated #1d1d1d +
surface-high #262626 +
surface-low #141414 +
brand-deep #d6f06a +
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) +
lime-text #e3ff73 +
lime-text-hover #edff9a +
link #e3ff73 +
link-hover #edff9a +
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) +
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) +
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) +
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) +
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) −
bg-soft #f6f3ec −
bg-elev #f1ede4 −
surface-2 #f6f3ec −
surface-3 #ebe6db −
brand-active #22742f −
accent-warm #fffbf6 −
accent-warm-deep #f3ece0 −
accent-lilac #efeaff −
accent-sky #e6f1fb −
border-subtle #00000008 −
border-focus #2e9e4f −
info-bg #e6f4ea typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Manrope","size":80} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Manrope","size":54} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} ~
h2 {"family":"Manrope","size":40} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Manrope","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.