GitLab vs Glif
55 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #fcfaf6 Text
#171321 → #0e0e10 Brand
#fc6d26 → #2e9e4f Border
#171321 → #0000000f Display font
GitLab Sans → Manrope Body size
18px → 16px colors 50 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #fcfaf6 ~
bg-soft #f2f1f5 → #f6f3ec ~
text #171321 → #0e0e10 ~
text-strong #171321 → #000000 ~
text-soft #4d4a57 → #86868c ~
text-muted #6e6b78 → #55555a ~
text-faint #9b99a3 → #b8b8be ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fffaef ~
brand #fc6d26 → #2e9e4f ~
brand-soft rgba(252, 109, 38, 0.10) → #e6f4ea ~
border #171321 → #0000000f +
bg-elev #f1ede4 +
surface-2 #f6f3ec +
surface-3 #ebe6db +
brand-hover #28893f +
brand-active #22742f +
accent-warm #fffbf6 +
accent-warm-deep #f3ece0 +
accent-lilac #efeaff +
accent-sky #e6f1fb +
border-strong #0000001f +
border-subtle #00000008 +
border-focus #2e9e4f +
success #2e9e4f +
success-bg #e6f4ea +
warning #d98a00 +
warning-bg #fdf2dc +
danger #d83a3a +
danger-bg #fbe7e7 +
info #2e9e4f +
info-bg #e6f4ea −
surface-soft #f2f1f5 −
surface-ink #171321 −
brand-red #e24329 −
brand-purple #6e49cb −
brand-gradient linear-gradient(135deg, #fc6d26 0%, #e24329 50%, #6e49cb 100%) −
cta-bg #171321 −
cta-text #ffffff −
cta-hover #2b2640 −
cta-light-bg #ffffff −
cta-light-text #171321 −
link #6e49cb −
link-hover #5a3aa8 −
border-soft #dcd9e3 −
border-faint #ece9f1 −
semantic-success #108548 −
semantic-warning #c17d10 −
semantic-danger #dd2b0e −
semantic-info #6e49cb −
shadow-tint rgba(23, 19, 33, 0.10) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":96} → {"family":"Manrope","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":48} → {"family":"Manrope","size":54} ~
h2 {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":40} → {"family":"Manrope","size":40} ~
body {"family":"GitLab Sans","size":18} → {"family":"Manrope","size":16} ~
label {"family":"GitLab Mono","size":14} → {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.