fal vs Postmark
57 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#000000 → #1c1d1f Brand
#252527 → #ffde00 Border
#e5e7eb → #e5e5e2 Display font
focal → Inter Body size
16px → 17px colors 48 changed
~
bg-soft #fafafa → #fafaf7 ~
surface #ffffff → #fff8d4 ~
text #000000 → #1c1d1f ~
text-muted #6b7280 → #5c5e63 ~
text-faint #9ca3af → #b3b6bc ~
text-on-dark #fafafa → #ffffff ~
brand #252527 → #ffde00 ~
brand-hover #0a0a0a → #f0d000 ~
on-brand #fafafa → #1c1d1f ~
border #e5e7eb → #e5e5e2 ~
border-strong #d1d5db → #cdcdc8 ~
border-soft #f0f0f0 → #f0f0ed +
bg-cream #fdfaf0 +
surface-neutral #f5f5f2 +
surface-2 #f0f0ed +
bg-dark #1c1d1f +
bg-dark-2 #26272a +
text-strong #000000 +
text-soft #8a8d93 +
text-on-dark-soft #c9ccd1 +
brand-active #e6c500 +
brand-soft #fff8d4 +
brand-deep #b39600 +
link #1c4eb8 +
link-hover #1a3f99 +
accent-blue #1c4eb8 +
accent-blue-soft #e6edff +
accent-green #22c55e +
accent-green-soft #dcfce7 +
accent-red #dc2626 +
accent-red-soft #fee2e2 +
accent-amber #f59e0b +
border-dark #3a3b3e +
shadow-soft rgba(28,29,31,0.06) +
shadow-medium rgba(28,29,31,0.10) +
shadow-strong rgba(28,29,31,0.18) +
semantic-success #22c55e +
semantic-warning #f59e0b +
semantic-danger #dc2626 +
semantic-info #1c4eb8 −
surface-elevated #ffffff −
surface-dark #0a0a0a −
surface-soft #f5f5f5 −
text-body #1b1b1d −
success #16a34a −
warning #d97706 −
danger #dc2626 −
info #2563eb typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"focal","size":120} → {"family":"Inter","size":72} ~
h1 {"family":"focal","size":40} → {"family":"Inter","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"focal","size":32} → {"family":"Inter","size":40} ~
body {"family":"publicSansRounded","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":17} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":12} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
xl 64px → 48px