fal vs Anytype
45 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #000000 Text
#000000 → #ffffff Brand
#252527 → #3cd9b3 Border
#e5e7eb → #262626 Display font
focal → Riccione Body size
16px → 16px colors 41 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #000000 ~
surface #ffffff → #0d0d0d ~
text #000000 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #6b7280 → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #9ca3af → #5c5c5c ~
brand #252527 → #3cd9b3 ~
brand-hover #0a0a0a → #2fc4a0 ~
on-brand #fafafa → #000000 ~
border #e5e7eb → #262626 ~
border-strong #d1d5db → #3a3a3a ~
border-soft #f0f0f0 → #1a1a1a ~
success #16a34a → #4cad00 ~
warning #d97706 → #ffb522 ~
danger #dc2626 → #ff6a7b ~
info #2563eb → #18a3f1 +
bg-deep #000000 +
surface-elev #1a1a1a +
surface-hover #242424 +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-secondary #b8b8b8 +
brand-active #27a98a +
brand-text #3cd9b3 +
brand-soft #0e2b25 +
any-teal #3cd9b3 +
any-blue #18a3f1 +
any-green #4cad00 +
any-amber #ffb522 +
border-brand #3cd9b3 +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.70) +
success-soft #0f2200 +
warning-soft #2a1d00 +
danger-soft #2e1115 −
bg-soft #fafafa −
surface-elevated #ffffff −
surface-dark #0a0a0a −
surface-soft #f5f5f5 −
text-body #1b1b1d −
text-on-dark #fafafa typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"focal","size":120} → {"family":"Riccione","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"focal","size":40} → {"family":"Riccione","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"focal","size":32} → {"family":"Riccione","size":36} ~
body {"family":"publicSansRounded","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.