Diff

CodeSandbox vs Warby Parker

51 token-level differences between these two design systems.

Role tokens
Background
#0e0e0e #ffffff
Text
#f0f0f0 #121212
Brand
#eaff96 #1050d0
Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) #e2e1da
Display font
TWK Everett fontIvoryLl
Body size
16px 16px
colors 46 changed
~ bg #0e0e0e #ffffff
~ surface #1d1d1d #ffffff
~ text #f0f0f0 #121212
~ text-strong #ffffff #072369
~ text-muted #a0a0a0 #5c5c5c
~ text-faint #5c5c5c #8a8a8a
~ brand #eaff96 #1050d0
~ brand-hover #f1ffb0 #0d44b0
~ on-brand #343434 #ffffff
~ link #e3ff73 #1050d0
~ link-hover #edff9a #0d44b0
~ border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) #e2e1da
~ border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) #121212
~ success #7ee787 #0f8a4f
~ warning #f0b429 #b06a00
~ danger #ff6b6b #c0331f
~ info #e3ff73 #1050d0
+ bg-soft #f7f7f5
+ bg-deeper #f0efe9
+ surface-soft #f7f7f5
+ accent-navy #072369
+ accent-navy-hover #05194d
+ on-navy #ffffff
+ button-light #ffffff
+ on-button-light #121212
+ text-on-brand #ffffff
+ selection-bg #cfe0fb
+ border-input #bdbcb4
bg-deep #080808
bg-elevated #1d1d1d
surface-high #262626
surface-low #141414
text-soft #8a8a8a
brand-deep #d6f06a
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14)
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07)
lime-text #e3ff73
lime-text-hover #edff9a
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06)
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45)
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14)
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14)
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14)
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6)
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4)
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22)
typography 4 changed
~ display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} {"family":"fontIvoryLl","size":80}
~ h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} {"family":"fontIvoryLl","size":40}
~ h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} {"family":"fontIvoryLl","size":32}
~ body {"family":"Inter","size":16} {"family":"Proxima Nova","size":16}
radius 1 changed
~ pill 9999px 100px
spacing identical
No differences.
↻ Swap direction · Warby Parker → CodeSandbox