CodeSandbox vs Shortwave
46 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#0e0e0e → #0c0e16 Text
#f0f0f0 → #ffffff Brand
#eaff96 → #356aff Border
rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → rgba(255,255,255,0.08) Display font
TWK Everett → Poppins Body size
16px → 16px colors 43 changed
~
bg #0e0e0e → #0c0e16 ~
surface #1d1d1d → #161922 ~
text #f0f0f0 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #a0a0a0 → #9aa3b8 ~
text-soft #8a8a8a → #c4cad8 ~
brand #eaff96 → #356aff ~
brand-hover #f1ffb0 → #2a59e6 ~
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) → #7d9bff ~
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) → rgba(53,106,255,0.12) ~
on-brand #343434 → #ffffff ~
border rgba(240,240,240,0.10) → rgba(255,255,255,0.08) ~
border-strong rgba(240,240,240,0.18) → rgba(255,255,255,0.16) ~
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) → rgba(255,255,255,0.04) ~
success #7ee787 → #3ecf8e ~
danger #ff6b6b → #ff5c5c ~
info #e3ff73 → #356aff +
bg-elev #11141d +
surface-elev #1d212c +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.32) +
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.48) +
shadow-brand rgba(53,106,255,0.30) +
scrim rgba(6,7,12,0.72) +
success-soft rgba(62,207,142,0.14) +
warning-soft rgba(240,180,41,0.14) +
danger-soft rgba(255,92,92,0.14) +
info-soft rgba(53,106,255,0.14) −
bg-deep #080808 −
bg-elevated #1d1d1d −
surface-high #262626 −
surface-low #141414 −
text-faint #5c5c5c −
brand-deep #d6f06a −
lime-text #e3ff73 −
lime-text-hover #edff9a −
link #e3ff73 −
link-hover #edff9a −
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) −
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) −
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) −
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) −
shadow-deep rgba(0,0,0,0.6) −
shadow-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.4) −
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) typography 3 changed
~
display {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} → {"family":"Poppins","size":64} ~
h1 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} → {"family":"Poppins","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} → {"family":"Poppins","size":32} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.