Coda vs OpenAI
57 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#212121 → #000000 Brand
#0066ff → #000000 Border
#e3e3e3 → rgba(0,0,0,0.1) Display font
Calibre-R → OpenAI Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
surface #ffffff → #fafafa ~
text #212121 → #000000 ~
text-muted #444444 → #5d5d5d ~
text-faint #717171 → #b4b4b4 ~
brand #0066ff → #000000 ~
brand-hover #0052cc → #1a1a1a ~
accent #f8ad40 → #10a37f ~
border #e3e3e3 → rgba(0,0,0,0.1) ~
border-soft #ededed → rgba(0,0,0,0.08) ~
border-strong #cccccc → rgba(0,0,0,0.16) ~
success #1a7f4b → #10a37f ~
warning #9a6400 → #d97706 ~
danger #c0392b → #cc2525 ~
info #0066ff → #3a3a3a +
bg-soft #f1f1f1 +
bg-section #f7f7f7 +
surface-card #ffffff +
surface-hover rgba(0,0,0,0.04) +
surface-press rgba(0,0,0,0.08) +
text-strong #000000 +
text-subtle #8e8e8e +
text-on-brand #ffffff +
text-on-dark #ededed +
brand-active #2c2c2c +
brand-on-dark #ffffff +
accent-hover #0d8a6b +
accent-soft #d6f3e8 +
link #000000 +
link-hover #5d5d5d +
link-visited #000000 +
scrim rgba(0,0,0,0.5) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.06) +
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.10) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.20) +
warning-soft #fdf3e7 +
danger-soft #fae5e5 −
surface-soft #fafafa −
surface-muted #f0f0f0 −
brand-soft #e6efff −
cta-primary #000000 −
accent-cream #fff6ec −
accent-callout #ffe6c9 −
accent-warm #f0e5dc −
block-green #006838 −
success-bg #e7f4ec −
warning-bg #fff3df −
danger-bg #fbeae8 −
info-bg #e6efff typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Calibre-R","size":72} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":48} ~
h1 {"family":"Calibre-R","size":48} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Calibre-R","size":38} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Inter","size":16} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans Mono","size":12} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
xl 64px → 48px