Chase vs Udio
48 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #000000 Text
#101820 → #f9f9f9 Brand
#0060f0 → #e30b5d Border
#d4d9e0 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) Display font
Open Sans → InnovatorFont Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #000000 ~
surface #ffffff → #0a0a0a ~
surface-soft #f5f7fa → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) ~
text #101820 → #f9f9f9 ~
text-muted #5a6470 → #c2c2c2 ~
text-faint #6b7280 → #737373 ~
brand #0060f0 → #e30b5d ~
brand-deep #003594 → #c2094f ~
link #0060f0 → #f9f9f9 ~
link-hover #0048bf → #e30b5d ~
border #d4d9e0 → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.10) ~
border-strong #9aa3af → rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.18) +
bg-alt #08080a +
surface-strong rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-soft #8a8a8a +
brand-soft rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
selected-bg rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.15) +
disabled #737373 +
border-subtle rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05) +
border-pink rgba(227, 11, 93, 0.40) +
success-bg rgba(34, 197, 94, 0.12) +
success-text #86efac +
warning-bg rgba(245, 166, 35, 0.12) +
warning-text #fcd34d +
danger-bg rgba(239, 68, 68, 0.12) +
danger-text #fca5a5 +
info-bg rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08) +
info-text #c2c2c2 −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
text-on-green #ffffff −
brand-hover #0048bf −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) −
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) −
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) −
success #128842 −
warning #9a5b00 −
danger #c4001a −
info #0060f0 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":60} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"InnovatorFont","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.