Chase vs OpenAI
54 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#101820 → #000000 Brand
#0060f0 → #000000 Border
#d4d9e0 → rgba(0,0,0,0.1) Display font
Open Sans → OpenAI Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 45 changed
~
surface #ffffff → #fafafa ~
text #101820 → #000000 ~
text-muted #5a6470 → #5d5d5d ~
text-faint #6b7280 → #b4b4b4 ~
brand #0060f0 → #000000 ~
brand-hover #0048bf → #1a1a1a ~
link #0060f0 → #000000 ~
link-hover #0048bf → #5d5d5d ~
border #d4d9e0 → rgba(0,0,0,0.1) ~
border-strong #9aa3af → rgba(0,0,0,0.16) ~
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) → rgba(0,0,0,0.5) ~
success #128842 → #10a37f ~
warning #9a5b00 → #d97706 ~
danger #c4001a → #cc2525 ~
info #0060f0 → #3a3a3a +
bg-soft #f1f1f1 +
bg-section #f7f7f7 +
surface-card #ffffff +
surface-hover rgba(0,0,0,0.04) +
surface-press rgba(0,0,0,0.08) +
text-strong #000000 +
text-subtle #8e8e8e +
text-on-dark #ededed +
brand-active #2c2c2c +
brand-on-dark #ffffff +
accent #10a37f +
accent-hover #0d8a6b +
accent-soft #d6f3e8 +
link-visited #000000 +
border-soft rgba(0,0,0,0.08) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.06) +
shadow-elev rgba(0,0,0,0.10) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.20) +
warning-soft #fdf3e7 +
danger-soft #fae5e5 −
surface-soft #f5f7fa −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-on-green #ffffff −
brand-deep #003594 −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) −
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":48} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":40} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":32} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"OpenAI Sans Mono","size":12} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 4 changed
~
xs 0px → 4px ~
sm 4px → 8px ~
md 12px → 16px ~
xl 64px → 48px