Chase vs Hume AI
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #fff9f3 Text
#101820 → #222222 Brand
#0060f0 → #222222 Border
#d4d9e0 → #e7dccd Display font
Open Sans → Fellix Body size
16px → 16px colors 54 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #fff9f3 ~
surface #ffffff → #f7ede1 ~
text #101820 → #222222 ~
text-muted #5a6470 → #5c554e ~
text-faint #6b7280 → #a89e92 ~
brand #0060f0 → #222222 ~
brand-hover #0048bf → #000000 ~
link #0060f0 → #222222 ~
link-hover #0048bf → #000000 ~
border #d4d9e0 → #e7dccd ~
border-strong #9aa3af → #d9cdbb ~
on-brand #ffffff → #fff9f3 +
bg-soft #fdf4ec +
surface-strong #efe2d2 +
surface-hover #f4e8da +
text-strong #000000 +
text-medium #3a3633 +
text-soft #7a7269 +
on-cta #fff9f3 +
brand-soft #3a3633 +
accent #e8d5c4 +
accent-deep #d9bfa6 +
accent-faint #f3e7da +
selected-bg #f3e7da +
disabled-bg #f4e8da +
disabled-text #a89e92 +
border-soft #f0e6d9 +
border-focus #222222 +
success-bg #e3efe0 +
success-text #3f6b3a +
warning-bg #fbeecf +
warning-text #8a6420 +
danger-bg #f7e0db +
danger-text #a4362a +
info-bg #e8e6e3 +
info-text #3a3633 +
shadow-rgb 34, 28, 22 +
shadow-warm 160, 120, 80 −
surface-soft #f5f7fa −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
text-on-green #ffffff −
brand-deep #003594 −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) −
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) −
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) −
success #128842 −
warning #9a5b00 −
danger #c4001a −
info #0060f0 typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"Fellix","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"Fellix","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"Fellix","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"Fellix","size":16} radius 2 changed
~
button 8px → 10px ~
card 12px → 18px spacing identical
No differences.