Chase vs Databricks
60 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #ffffff Text
#101820 → #1b3139 Brand
#0060f0 → #EB1600 Border
#d4d9e0 → #dde2e6 Display font
Open Sans → DM Sans Body size
16px → 16px colors 53 changed
~
surface #ffffff → #f6f7f9 ~
text #101820 → #1b3139 ~
text-muted #5a6470 → #a3b1bc ~
brand #0060f0 → #EB1600 ~
brand-deep #003594 → #E0250F ~
link #0060f0 → #0a5fb8 ~
link-hover #0048bf → #073f7c ~
border #d4d9e0 → #dde2e6 ~
border-strong #9aa3af → #bcc5cd +
bg-dark #1b3139 +
bg-deep #0a0a0a +
bg-surface #f6f7f9 +
bg-soft #fafbfc +
bg-feature #fff4f1 +
text-charcoal #243640 +
text-slate #445566 +
text-steel #5e7382 +
text-stone #7a8b97 +
on-dark #ffffff +
on-dark-muted #a3b1bc +
brand-pressed #B71D08 +
brand-dark #9B1A07 +
brand-soft #ffe1da +
brand-teal-deep #1b3139 +
brand-teal #243d48 +
brand-teal-light #2f5260 +
accent-orange #FF8B4A +
accent-amber #FFB400 +
accent-violet #8B5CF6 +
accent-cyan #00A1C9 +
border-soft #eceff2 +
border-dark #2f5260 +
semantic-success #00875A +
semantic-warning-bg #fff7e0 +
semantic-warning-text #7a5a00 +
semantic-error #D7263D +
semantic-info #0a5fb8 −
surface-soft #f5f7fa −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-faint #6b7280 −
text-on-green #ffffff −
brand-hover #0048bf −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) −
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) −
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) −
success #128842 −
warning #9a5b00 −
danger #c4001a −
info #0060f0 typography 5 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"DM Sans","size":80} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"DM Sans","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"DM Sans","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"DM Sans","size":16} ~
label {"family":"SFMono-Regular","size":13} → {"family":"JetBrains Mono","size":13} radius identical
No differences.
spacing 2 changed
~
lg 32px → 24px ~
xl 64px → 40px