Chase vs CodeSandbox
48 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #0e0e0e Text
#101820 → #f0f0f0 Brand
#0060f0 → #eaff96 Border
#d4d9e0 → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) Display font
Open Sans → TWK Everett Body size
16px → 16px colors 44 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #0e0e0e ~
surface #ffffff → #1d1d1d ~
text #101820 → #f0f0f0 ~
text-muted #5a6470 → #a0a0a0 ~
text-faint #6b7280 → #5c5c5c ~
brand #0060f0 → #eaff96 ~
brand-hover #0048bf → #f1ffb0 ~
brand-deep #003594 → #d6f06a ~
link #0060f0 → #e3ff73 ~
link-hover #0048bf → #edff9a ~
border #d4d9e0 → rgba(240,240,240,0.10) ~
border-strong #9aa3af → rgba(240,240,240,0.18) ~
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) → rgba(0,0,0,0.4) ~
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) → rgba(0,0,0,0.6) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #343434 ~
success #128842 → #7ee787 ~
warning #9a5b00 → #f0b429 ~
danger #c4001a → #ff6b6b ~
info #0060f0 → #e3ff73 +
bg-deep #080808 +
bg-elevated #1d1d1d +
surface-high #262626 +
surface-low #141414 +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-soft #8a8a8a +
brand-soft rgba(234,255,150,0.14) +
brand-tint rgba(234,255,150,0.07) +
lime-text #e3ff73 +
lime-text-hover #edff9a +
border-soft rgba(240,240,240,0.06) +
border-brand rgba(234,255,150,0.45) +
success-bg rgba(126,231,135,0.14) +
warning-bg rgba(240,180,41,0.14) +
danger-bg rgba(255,107,107,0.14) +
shadow-glow rgba(234,255,150,0.22) −
surface-soft #f5f7fa −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
text-on-green #ffffff −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":120} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":56} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"TWK Everett","size":40} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.