Chase vs Anytype
52 token-level differences between these two design systems.
Background
#ffffff → #000000 Text
#101820 → #ffffff Brand
#0060f0 → #3cd9b3 Border
#d4d9e0 → #262626 Display font
Open Sans → Riccione Body size
16px → 16px colors 48 changed
~
bg #ffffff → #000000 ~
surface #ffffff → #0d0d0d ~
text #101820 → #ffffff ~
text-muted #5a6470 → #8a8a8a ~
text-faint #6b7280 → #5c5c5c ~
brand #0060f0 → #3cd9b3 ~
brand-hover #0048bf → #2fc4a0 ~
border #d4d9e0 → #262626 ~
border-strong #9aa3af → #3a3a3a ~
scrim rgba(16,24,32,0.55) → rgba(0,0,0,0.70) ~
on-brand #ffffff → #000000 ~
success #128842 → #4cad00 ~
warning #9a5b00 → #ffb522 ~
danger #c4001a → #ff6a7b ~
info #0060f0 → #18a3f1 +
bg-deep #000000 +
surface-elev #1a1a1a +
surface-hover #242424 +
text-strong #ffffff +
text-secondary #b8b8b8 +
brand-active #27a98a +
brand-text #3cd9b3 +
brand-soft #0e2b25 +
any-teal #3cd9b3 +
any-blue #18a3f1 +
any-green #4cad00 +
any-amber #ffb522 +
border-soft #1a1a1a +
border-brand #3cd9b3 +
shadow-ambient rgba(0,0,0,0.50) +
shadow-card rgba(0,0,0,0.65) +
shadow-modal rgba(0,0,0,0.80) +
success-soft #0f2200 +
warning-soft #2a1d00 +
danger-soft #2e1115 −
surface-soft #f5f7fa −
surface-tint #eef4ff −
text-on-brand #ffffff −
text-on-green #ffffff −
brand-deep #003594 −
secondary #128842 −
secondary-hover #0e6e35 −
link #0060f0 −
link-hover #0048bf −
border-on-dark rgba(255,255,255,0.24) −
shadow-soft rgba(16,24,32,0.06) −
shadow-medium rgba(16,24,32,0.12) −
shadow-deep rgba(16,24,32,0.20) typography 4 changed
~
display {"family":"Open Sans","size":80} → {"family":"Riccione","size":88} ~
h1 {"family":"Open Sans","size":40} → {"family":"Riccione","size":48} ~
h2 {"family":"Open Sans","size":32} → {"family":"Riccione","size":36} ~
body {"family":"Open Sans","size":16} → {"family":"Inter","size":16} radius identical
No differences.
spacing identical
No differences.